It’s bereft of justice- Atiku rejects tribunal judgement, heads to Supreme court

It’s bereft of justice- Atiku rejects tribunal judgement, heads to Supreme court

The presidential candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party in the February 25, 2023 Presidential election, Atiku Abubakar, has rejected the judgement of the presidential election petition tribunal.

Atiku addressed a press conference at the party’s headquarters in Abuja this afternoon, September 7, where he declared that the judgement of bereft of justice. He said the tribunal judgement failed to restore confidence.

““The last presidential election in our country and the way it was managed by the electoral umpire, the Independent National Electoral Commission, leaves behind unenviable precedents, which I believe the courts have a duty to redress. Our gains in ensuring transparent elections through the deployment of technology was heavily compromised by INEC in the way it managed the last presidential election, and I am afraid that the judgement of the court as rendered by the Presidential Election Petition Tribunal yesterday, failed to restore confidence in our dreams of free and fair elections devoid of human manipulations.

“Like I did say at the beginning of this legal battle when I instructed my lawyers to file my petition challenging the outcome of the presidential election, my ultimate goal in this pursuit is to ensure that democracy is further strengthened through the principles and processes of fair hearing.

“Gentlemen of the press, I take great pains to tell you that the decision of the court of first instance on this matter utterly falls far short of that expectation. I am therefore here to tell you that, though the judgment of the court yesterday is respected, it is a judgment that I refuse to accept. I refuse to accept the judgment because I believe that it is bereft of substantial justice. However, the disappointment in the verdict of the court can never destroy my confidence in the judiciary.

“Consequently, I have asked my lawyers to activate my constitutionally guaranteed rights of appeal to the higher court, which, in the instance, is the Supreme Court.“